top of page

CRO Chief Risk Officer Community supported GS1 Hong Kong convened its 12th Food Safety Forum under the theme “Feeding the Future: Advancing Safe and Sustainable Food Through Technology.” at HKPC

andrewchan722
Sep 4
4 min read
CRO Chief Risk Officer, Andrew Chan FCA signs on the wall with “CRO” at the GS1 Hong Kong - 12th Food Safety Forum at HKPC on 28 August 2026
CRO Chief Risk Officer, Andrew Chan FCA signs on the wall with “CRO” at the GS1 Hong Kong - 12th Food Safety Forum at HKPC on 28 August 2026

From source to table, food safety is no longer a quality checklist. It is enterprise risk.


Last Friday at the Hong Kong Productivity Council, CRO Chief Risk Officer Community supported the GS1 Hong Kong convened its 12th Food Safety Forum under the theme “Feeding the Future: Advancing Safe and Sustainable Food Through Technology.” Around 300 professionals from government, retail, catering, production, logistics and aquaculture filled the Conference Hall on 4/F of the HKPC Building. The conversation was not only about barcodes. It was about trust, resilience and who owns the risk when a supply chain fails.

That is a CRO conversation.

What the room actually said

Ms Diane Wong Shuk-han, JP, Under Secretary for Environment and Ecology, opened the afternoon as Guest of Honour. Her message was clear: Hong Kong’s role as super-connector and super value-adder depends on trusted product data, including QR codes built on GS1 standards for digital food labelling — now reflected in national standards. She looked ahead to wider adoption, especially by SMEs that need traceability without a Fortune 500 budget.

Mr Keith Wu, Chairman of GS1 HK’s Food and Beverage Industry Advisory Board, put it more bluntly in his welcome: extreme weather, regulatory change and cross-border logistics have moved food safety out of the quality department. It is now central to business survival, brand value and sustainable development. The next chapter, he said, will be written with technology, data and standards.

That is the language of risk-based decision making.

Mainland rules add a hard deadline. The General Principles of Pre-packaged Food Labels and the Measures for Supervision and Administration of Food Labeling take effect in March 2027. Digital labelling appears for the first time. Ordinary QR codes will not be enough. GS1-powered 2D codes can carry batch, expiry, origin, certifications and recycling data, and then link to a fuller product story. Companies already using GS1 HK’s 1QR platform are not “doing marketing.” They are building an audit trail consumers and regulators can scan.

Why this sits on the CRO agenda

Food risk is rarely a single control failure. It is a chain:

  • Source risk — climate, origin fraud, aquaculture and livestock integrity

  • Process risk — HACCP and ISO 22000 only work if data is complete and timely

  • Logistics risk — cold chain, cross-border handoffs, last-mile opacity

  • Regulatory risk — Mainland digital labelling in 2027; EU Digital Product Passport logic travelling the same road

  • Reputation and ESG risk — one recall, one false claim, one Scope 3 gap

  • Data risk — AI and analytics are only as good as the identifiers they consume

Ms Anna Lin, MH, JP, Chief Executive of GS1 Hong Kong, said trusted data is how firms meet regulation, raise efficiency and stay competitive. From a risk seat, that sentence should be inverted: without trusted data, the control environment is theatre.

The afternoon’s panel — Smart Supply Chains: Safeguarding Sustainable Food Safety — brought practitioners from DKSH, Murray Rice, Tai Po Chun Hing and Tong Shun Hing Poultry, with case views also from Tam Jai, AS Watson Industries and Hong Kong Aquaculture Innovation. The useful pattern was the same: standards first, then technology; visibility first, then AI. Do not bolt analytics onto a fragmented identifier landscape and call it transformation.

Recognition is a control signal, not a trophy

Twenty-one companies were recognised under the upgraded Quality Food Scheme, now with three categories — Diversity, Traceability and Transparency — assessed against ISO 22000, HACCP and the GS1 Global Traceability Standard. Award presenters included the Hon Shiu Ka-fai, BBS, JP; the Hon Jonathan Leung Chun, MH; and Mr Edward Yu, Deputy Secretary for Environment and Ecology (Food).

Lee Kum Kee stood out on Traceability. Watsons Water and others appeared across Diversity and Transparency. The point for boards is not the plaque. It is that an independent, standards-based assessment now exists. That is usable assurance for Audit & Risk Committees — and a benchmark internal audit can test against.

Five questions I would take back to a Board Risk Committee

  1. Can we reconstruct a product’s journey in hours, not weeks? If not, we do not have traceability. We have hope.

  2. Are our identifiers globally interoperable? Proprietary QR codes create local convenience and global fragility.

  3. Who owns food and product-data risk? Quality, supply chain, legal, sustainability and IT each hold a piece. The CRO’s job is to make the pieces one risk.

  4. Is March 2027 on the regulatory horizon map? Digital labelling is a known date. Treat it as a programme, not a packaging project.

  5. Does our internal audit plan test data lineage, not only SOP existence? A signed HACCP manual without scan-level evidence is a residual risk.

Be water — but keep a standard

Bruce Lee’s line still applies: be water. Supply chains will keep changing shape — climate, geopolitics, new labelling regimes, AI-assisted fraud. Rigidity breaks. But water still needs a channel. GS1 standards are that channel: a common language so data can flow from farm to fork, from Hong Kong to the Mainland and onward.

The CRO who only polices yesterday’s controls will miss this. The CRO who treats trusted product data as a growth asset — fewer recalls, faster market access, cleaner ESG evidence, better trade-finance data — becomes the partner the C-suite actually wants in the room.

Last Friday at HKPC, the food industry showed it understands that shift. Risk leaders should not wait for the next incident to catch up.

Technology without standards is noise.


Standards without ownership is paperwork.


Ownership without board attention is hope.

Food safety’s next milestone will be decided by which organisations treat traceability as a first-class risk control — and which still treat it as a barcode on a box.



Follow CRO Chief Risk Officer for executive roundtables, workshops and community events across Hong Kong, Asia and the world. Support the work of putting more value-added CRO seats in the region. Join as a Global Risk Advocate — individual and corporate memberships are open.





 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page